Participation performance measures
Strategic objective 1:
‘All students, from all backgrounds, with the ability and desire to undertake higher education, are supported to access, succeed in, and progress from higher education.’
We have two strategic outcomes under this strategic objective, and seven key performance measures (KPMs) to help us demonstrate progress against them.
Strategic outcome: access, success and progression are not limited by background and identity, and gaps are significantly reduced
1. Gap in participation between most and least represented groups
30.9 percentage points
In 2017-18, there was a gap of 30.9 percentage points between the most and least represented groups
We have postponed setting a target for this measure – learn more
The overall participation gap has reduced steadily in recent years
See KPM 1
2. Gap in participation at higher-tariff providers between the most and least represented groups
19.8 percentage points
In 2017-18, there was a gap of 19.8 percentage points between the most and least represented groups
The participation gap at higher-tariff providers has widened slightly, and the participation ratio has declined in recent years
See KPM 2
3. Gap in non-continuation between most and least represented groups
4.4 percentage points
In 2016-17, there was a difference of 4.4 percentage points between the non-continuation rates of the most and the least represented groups
The gap in non-continuation has changed very little since 2014-15
See KPM 3
4. Gap in degree outcomes (1sts or 2:1s) between white students and black students
23.1 percentage points
In 2017-18, there was a difference of 23.1 percentage points between the proportion of white and black students getting a 1st or 2:1
The gap in degree outcomes has been falling but remains large
See KPM 4
5. Gap in degree outcomes (1sts or 2:1s) between disabled students and non-disabled students
2.8 percentage points
In 2017-18, there was a difference of 2.8 percentage points between the proportion of disabled and non-disabled students getting a 1st or 2:1
There has been no further reduction of the gap in degree outcomes since 2015-16
See KPM 5
Strategic outcome: All access and participation activity is underpinned by evidence and ‘what works’.
6. The proportion of access and participation plans that contain robust evaluation methods, focused on impact and leading to improved practice
In development:
We expect to specify this measure during Spring 2019
This will be an interim measure looking at the use of effective evidence and evaluation.
Making sure that interventions either have a strong evidence base, or are developing new evidence themselves, will ultimately improve the impact of access and participation spending and therefore support improvements in outcomes for students. We will soon develop more sophisticated measures looking at the standards of evidence used.
7. Ratio of outcomes achieved through access and participation to money spent on access and participation
In development:
We expect to specify this measure during Spring 2019
We don’t just want access and participation work to have an impact, we want it to have as much impact as possible given the resources available.
The measure will capture the sector's ability to use access and participation funding effectively.
Feedback
We welcome feedback on the key performance measures, including on our overall approach and on individual measures. If you have any comments or queries, please contact Josh Fleming at [email protected].
If you have any queries about the statistics published as KPMs, please contact Matthew Jones at [email protected].
The Office for Students is committed to following the Code of Practice for Statistics for the statistics it produces. See more information and our statistics release schedule.
If you have any other questions or complaints about statistics produced by the Office for Students, please contact Mark Gittoes, Head of Research and Analysis at [email protected] or call 0117 931 7052.
Describe your experience of using this website