National Student Survey data: provider-level
Provider-level data
This page contains an updated visualisation of data from the latest National Student Survey (NSS) for each participating higher education provider.
Results are shown for NSS 2025 and NSS 2024. You can use the dashboard to visualise the data filtered by year, registering provider (the provider that has overall control of the higher education content, delivery, assessment and quality assurance arrangements), mode of study, subject level (CAH1 and CAH3) and subject.
Note: To support easier navigation, question 28 and the healthcare questions are included in the same dashboard view as the other questions and themes. However, they have a different format from the other survey questions, so their positivity measures cannot be directly compared with those of the other questions.
We have limited the number of filters in this dashboard to maximise usability and loading speed, but the dashboard may still be slow to load at busy times.
Spreadsheets with the full NSS provider-level data (including teaching provider, level of study and subjects at CAH2) are available as an alternative.
Data quality notes
Read the NSS 2024 quality report for full details
There are some issues with the completeness of some of the data collected by JISC, which has an impact on our benchmarking. To mitigate this, we have used student data for ethnicity, sex, care experienced status and socioeconomic classification (SEC) from the same student in the previous year. These variables were chosen for backfilling because they are subject to more missingness than usual and are unlikely to change between years. While there will still be some missingness remaining in these variables, this backfilling reduces the need to suppress benchmarked results due to missing data.
There are specific data quality issues relating to five providers:
University of Chester
There is a data quality issue known to affect partnership arrangements data for this provider, where some students who were taught at a different provider in 2022-23 were instead recorded as both registered and taught at the University of Chester. This may mean that a small number of students are allocated to Chester rather than the appropriate teaching provider.
University of Hertfordshire
The 2022-23 student data return submitted by the University of Hertfordshire did not meet our data quality requirements in full and there remain outstanding issues with its data that could impact on its onward use. We are publishing indicators for this provider because these impacts are expected to be marginal, but users should be aware they have the potential to mean that some people with disabilities may not have had any known disabilities recorded, and this may make the benchmarked results for this provider less reliable.
University of Bedfordshire
The 2022-23 Student data return submitted by the University of Bedfordshire did not meet our data quality requirements in full and there remain outstanding issues with its data that have the potential to impact on its onward use. These impacts are expected to be marginal, but could mean that some students on two-year courses may have been wrongly recorded as full-time.
Navitas UK Holding Limited
There is a data quality issue which may affect the population of taught students for this provider, where some students who were registered at a different provider but taught by Navitas UK Holdings Limited may have been erroneously reported as being taught by a different provider. The may lead to some NSS respondents being allocated to the wrong providers.
University of Edinburgh
There is a data quality issue which may affect the population of students for this provider, where some students were not included in the 2022-23 HESA student data return. This affects intercalating students from medical courses. This may lead to the NSS population being lower than the actual number of students studying on medical courses at this provider.
Read the NSS 2023 quality report for full details
Glasgow Caledonian University (GCU)
Due to a survey administration error, question 28 ('overall satisfaction') was not asked of the majority of survey respondents from Glasgow Caledonian University (GCU). We therefore replaced the GCU results with the Scottish sector average and did not publish results for subject-level GCU populations for this question in NSS 2023. The error was not the fault of the provider and does not reflect on the quality of the provider.
Using the data and dashboard
The data dashboard allows you to select NSS results, using the filters at the top of the dashboard. You can use the filters to focus on a particular population. For example, when viewing the NSS results for the UK, you can use the filters to focus on those students who are studying full-time, or who are studying a particular subject.
To support easier navigation, question 28 and the healthcare questions are included in the same table as the other questions and themes.
You can sort each column in the table by clicking the arrows in the bottom-left corner of the column header. To restore the default sorting, click the ‘Reset sorting’ button under the ‘Show help’ icon. For further guidance on using the dashboard, select the ‘Show help’ button in the top right-hand corner.
This dashboard contains NSS results presented by registering provider (the provider that has overall control of the higher education content, delivery, assessment and quality assurance arrangements). Users are able to visualise the NSS data using the following filters:
- Provider
- Year (NSS 2025 and/or NSS 2024 data)
- Mode of study
- Subject level (CAH1 and CAH3)
- Subject
In order to maximise the usability of the dashboard we have restricted the filters available to allow users to access headline results easily. Provider level data with all available splits (such as teaching institution, level of study, subject at CAH2 and the results for the healthcare, allied health, and clinical practice placement questions) are available as spreadsheets for both NSS 2025 and NSS 2024.
The dashboard contains multiple filters and it will take a moment to reload the dashboard when each filter is changed. This loading time can vary based on internet speed and the processing power of the device used. We are aware that the dashboard can be particularly slow on the day of the annual NSS publication, due to the high number of users, and we are actively looking for solutions to this.
All the data available on the dashboards can be accessed using our data downloads, which we provide in CSV and Excel format.
As part of ongoing improvements to the dashboard, we have removed the shaded bars that previously illustrated statistical uncertainty. This is because Power BI (the platform we are now using for data visualisations) currently does not allow us to show shaded bars in the same way as Tableau (our previous data visualisation platform).
We will continue to review and develop the dashboard and will monitor user feedback to understand whether additional features – such as the shaded bars – should be reintroduced in future.
Question 27 ("During your studies, how free did you feel to express your ideas, opinions, and beliefs?") is only asked of students studying in providers in England. Therefore, country-level statistics for Question 27 are not provided for Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, or the UK.
Question 28 ("Overall, I am satisfied with the quality of the course") is only asked of students studying in providers in Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. Therefore, country-level statistics for Question 28 are not provided for England or the UK.
Note: Question 28 has a different format from the other survey questions, and five rather than four response options. Because of this, the positivity measure for Question 28 cannot be straightforwardly compared with the positivity measure for the other questions. In particular, we would typically expect the positivity measure for Question 28 to be lower than the positivity measure for the other questions, because we allow respondents to take a neutral stance (“Neither agree nor disagree”).
By changing the filters on the data dashboard, you may arrive at a selection for which no data is available. This would happen, for instance, if you selected the filter “Computing” for a provider that did not offer computing courses. When this happens, you will be presented with the message “Data unavailable”. You can leave this page by choosing a different combination of filters, or by refreshing your browser.
If you receive an error message beginning with '{"result":' when trying to view a dashboard on our website, try closing and restarting your Internet browser. This issue can occur if you have viewed a dashboard on the OfS portal since opening your current browser session.
It is not possible to view our dashboards on the portal and on our website concurrently in the same browser. To switch between them you will need to restart your browser, delete your browser cookies, or use two different browsers.
When NSS results are aggregated at the level of country (UK, England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales) we do not calculate benchmarks. This is because the benchmarking method does not create meaningful results in many of these cases. The “Benchmark value %” column will show “N/A” in these cases.
Rarely, we are unable to calculate benchmarks for provider-level data. In some cases, one or more of the benchmarking factors are unknown for most students in a provider/subject/mode split. In these cases, the results are shown as “BK”. Benchmarks are also unavailable in some cases when the provider makes an extremely large contribution to its own benchmark. These results are shown as “N/A”. Similarly, we do not provide benchmarks when results are suppressed as “DPL” or “DP”:
- Data Protection Low (DPL): When the response rate for a publication unit is 100 per cent and all, or nearly all, students responded negatively to a particular question. This is to ensure that students feel able to honestly report poor quality, without the risk of being identified. This suppression is very rare; when it occurs, we indicate that the positivity measure for the question is very low using the marker ‘DPL’, but otherwise provide minimal information.
- Data Protection (DP): When, for a publication unit, a theme includes a question that is DPL-suppressed. In this case, publishing the theme measure could allow data users to infer information about the suppressed DPL measure. We therefore suppress the theme measure too and mark it as ‘DP’ (data protection).
Last updated 03 June 2026 + show all updates
03 June 2026 - We have republished the NSS provider-level dashboard using Power BI as our new data visualisation tool. We have updated some of the questions and answers under 'Using the data and dashboard' to reflect this update.
09 July 2025 - Published NSS 2025 results.
13 September 2024 - Added data quality note for University of Edinburgh.
10 July 2024 - Published NSS 2024 data.
Describe your experience of using this website